Moderator: Moderators
Talk to me again after 92 years of favoritism...Jordysghost wrote: Sure hasn't, Fail mary, O9 wildcard game no call on the facemask, 1998 instant replay game, illegal pick play (Admitted to by the NFL) on AZs last regulation score last year, we have gotten #### by the refs far more then you have, yet we valiantly fight through for SB wins regardless.
Why? You have never been #### by the refs like the Packers, all of those calls listed above were incidents where bad calls indisputably led to a loss or extremely unfavorable situation, can you name just as many? Ill spot you one, the hail mary (which was a missed pushoff, making it about half of the fail mary) just 3 and half more to go..Thaumaturgist wrote:It's pretty rich of you to complain about the refs... Rich I tell you!
Except that very post you qouted proves we couldnt have had favoritism, still waiting for you to counter, 3 and half more to go..Thaumaturgist wrote: Talk to me again after 92 years of favoritism...
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/09/nfl-wee ... s-refereesJordysghost wrote: Except that very post you qouted proves we couldnt have had favoritism, still waiting for you to counter, 3 and half more to go..
No the flags were immediate and from TWO refs. I was there not munching on curds at home. Wait for Wednesday although I'm sure you'll have another excuse then.Jordysghost wrote: Turnovers for one team, are takeaways for another.
No you cant, not on Randalls call, he made barely any contact and there was no call untl your crowd demanded it, and it still came 15 seconds later, can't have anything spoil that stadium opening huh?
Its ok, your still the Vikings, we will make you our #### later because that is what we do to worthless loser teams.
'The flags were immediate' lmao, and the sky is polka dots and the earth is square, are you even trying to make a point? lmao 15 seconds later isnt 'immediate'. I know your not actually dumb enough to believe that flag was 'immediate' so stop being silly.S197 wrote: No the flags were immediate and from TWO refs. I was there not munching on curds at home. Wait for Wednesday although I'm sure you'll have another excuse then.
Our defense had multiple turnovers and sacks. Should have had 3 more. Did the Pack come close to picking off a ball? Yeah didn't think so. But your defense is better right?
Oh and lol at the Jags being a great team. Did you see the score yesterday? Listen Al, you had a good run, but now you're back in that wasteland GB living with Peg and the kids selling shoes to fat women.
Speaking of which, maybe they should change their name to the manatees. Much more fitting for your obese fan base that has nothing to live for other than football.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
We already know were going to blow you out in Lambeau (Fate decrees you are our #### good for one laughter a year) and we already know that we will continue to compete for SBs, because that we are us and you are you. The Rams have won 4/5 against the chickens .. so I would say that matters a little bit...Lmao are the Rams also on the rise while the Squawks are on the fall? Nope, just week 2, sometimes these things happen, but the good news is, you got your win out of they, so being that you are the Vikes, week 15 is an auto win for us.
Right, but that is my point, do you really think they are going to eclipse the Squawks as consistent contender from that division? Because I myself find that extremely unlikely.jackal wrote: The Rams have won 4/5 against the chickens .. so I would say that matters a little bit...
Three of them in a row... BTW
not after the debacle trade they made... three years of early picks for a backup .. well 3rd string guy so far AFAIKRight, but that is my point, do you really think they are going to eclipse the Squawks as consistent contender from that division? Because I myself find that extremely unlikely.
Your not being nearly as hostile as I would like.jackal wrote: not after the debacle trade they made... three years of early picks for a backup .. well 3rd string guy so far AFAIK
You.. do realize it is reffering to multiple missed calls in one game, not multiple missed calls on one team right? As in, bad calls in favor if the Jags and stuff.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGlMvgoR8EY here is one of my favorites you spoiled rotten cheese head. Best part is if it was counted as a TD (which it was) you guys would of finished 9-7 and never won the super bowl that yearJordysghost wrote:
Why? You have never been #### by the refs like the Packers, all of those calls listed above were incidents where bad calls indisputably led to a loss or extremely unfavorable situation, can you name just as many? Ill spot you one, the hail mary (which was a missed pushoff, making it about half of the fail mary) just 3 and half more to go..
. Hearing a cheese head cry about the refs is hilarious and even better watching our defense eat your "HOF" QB alive, and on top of that Diggs showing nelson how it is done. So much blue cheese I cant stand it. Do you not get that I never said anything about the Vikings in my post? It's ALL about Packers Favoritism? Why do you like to change the subject? I guess it's because you can't defend yourself.Jordysghost wrote: You.. do realize it is reffering to multiple missed calls in one game, not multiple missed calls on one team right? As in, bad calls in favor if the Jags and stuff.
Still waiting for you to counter though, just 3 and half more to go.
Refs miss NINE calls Packers Vs. VikingsControversial call No. 1
The Shiancoe incompletion is worth another look ... it appears as though the tight end has the ball securely between his forearms, and the ground helps him nada. Yet, the replay booth didn't see it that way.
Controversial call No. 2
Unfortunately, the Shiancoe non-touchdown was not the only gift to the green and gold on this Sunday night in October. Check out Andrew Quarless' second quarter touchdown catch from Aaron Rodgers. It sure looks like that loaf is shuffling around in his bread basket as he hits the ground ⦠unlike Shiancoe, who had complete control of the football when he hit the deck on his catch.
There, I didn't have to look hard, and that's just against the packers... Again, my point is to show Packers Favoritism which as a blind packers fan you'll never see.MINNEAPOLIS - The NFL has acknowledged its officiating crew made at least nine mistakes during Sunday's Green Bay-Minnesota game, including a key pass interference call, two newspapers reported Wednesday.
It's the smack shack, so I'll say what I've been dying to say ...Jordysghost wrote: LMFAO, Diggs is not, nor will ever be as good or better the Nelson, do you know anything about football?
Yea, but we obviously would have won without that absolutely ridiculous mark back after we were given the first down, and also that moronic and non sensical PI to hand you the game, i mean comon, he didn't even touch him, its clear by how late the flag came out what that trash was about. (Be real, if that call was made against you we wouldn't hear the end of it for year)
Lmao are the Rams also on the rise while the Squawks are on the fall? Nope, just week 2, sometimes these things happen, but the good news is, you got your win out of they, so being that you are the Vikes, week 15 is an auto win for us.
Even with such awful key calls, we still only lost by 3 in your home opener, its all good, we are still going to cruise easily to a div title and make your our #### at Lambeau. (By alot more then 3)
No need to worry, the Packers are the Packers and are usually slow starters on the season, but your the Vikings, you don't even have a dream of actually doing something this year.
Congrats you guys, I wish we had won, but you can't win them all, but lets face it, you'd trade not only this game, but your entire history for just one SB win, its no big deal, like always the only SB contender to come out of this division will be one will SB wins and history that means something.
